“In the fiat standard, those who choose to hold positive balances are robbed as the purchasing power of their fiat is eroded by all the debt others are creating. Those who are in debt, on the other hand, get to benefit from some of the seigniorage. Not taking on debt is reckless financial irresponsibility.”
— Saifedean Ammous, The Fiat Standard, Ch.5
This is not hyperbole. It’s a description of the incentive structure of the current monetary system, derived from first principles.
The fiat standard is not neutral. It has a direction. It moves wealth from those who save to those who borrow, from those who produce to those who control the money supply. Understanding how this happens, mechanically, institutionally, and systemically, is the prerequisite for any serious engagement with what Bitcoin represents.
Fiat Mining: Credit as Money Creation
In Bitcoin, new coins are created through mining: computers expend energy to validate transactions and compete for newly issued bitcoin. Supply grows on a fixed schedule. The difficulty adjusts. Nobody can print more.
In fiat, Ammous observes, new money is created through the equivalent of mining: credit creation. When a commercial bank issues a loan, it creates new money. The deposit the borrower receives is not drawn from existing reserves, it’s new money, created in the act of lending.
This means every commercial bank is a fiat miner. The bank’s profits, the spread between interest earned and interest paid, are the miner’s reward. And unlike Bitcoin, there is no difficulty adjustment. No cap. No mathematical constraint on how much fiat can be mined.
The practical consequence: the money supply expands in proportion to the extension of credit, not in proportion to economic output. Productive activity does not create new money. Debt creation does.
The Cantillon Mechanism in Detail
Richard Cantillon, writing in the 1730s, described what happens when new money is injected into an economy. It doesn’t raise all prices simultaneously and proportionally. It flows through specific channels. Those who receive it first spend it at current prices. As the money circulates outward, prices rise. Those who receive it last face higher prices on everything they buy.
In the eighteenth century, Cantillon described this in terms of gold flowing into Europe from the Americas. In the twenty-first century, the mechanism is the same but the channels are different. New fiat money is created primarily through mortgage lending, government borrowing, and corporate credit.
The first beneficiaries: financial institutions (who earn the spread on new credit), homeowners (whose assets appreciate), governments (who borrow at rates below inflation), and large corporations (who access credit markets cheaply). The last to receive the new money: wage earners (whose income rises only after prices), savers (who hold cash while it depreciates), and fixed-income retirees (whose purchasing power is structurally eroded).
This is not an accidental outcome. It is the predictable result of how money enters the system.
QE as Cantillon Dynamics at Scale
The Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing programs represent the Cantillon effect at institutional scale.
The Fed purchases assets, primarily government bonds and mortgage-backed securities, from banks and institutional investors. It pays with newly created reserves. This places new money directly into the financial system. The institutions receiving new reserves deploy that capital into other assets. Asset prices rise: stocks, real estate, bonds.
Between 2008 and early 2022, the Fed’s balance sheet grew from approximately $900 billion to a peak near $8.9 trillion. The S&P 500 grew from roughly 900 points to over 4,700. If you held $1 million in equities in 2009, you held approximately $5.2 million by 2021. If you held $1 million in a savings account, you earned perhaps $30,000 in interest over the same period while your purchasing power eroded.
The Cantillon effect is not a historical artifact. It is the operating mechanism of the current financial system.
The Debt Trap by Design
Here is the darkest aspect of Ammous’s analysis: the fiat system systematically pushes individuals, corporations, and governments into debt, not through malice, but through structural incentives.
If inflation runs at 6% annually and you can borrow at 4%, holding debt is rational. The real value of your debt declines by 2% per year. Conversely, holding savings that earn 0.5% while inflation runs at 6% means losing 5.5% of your wealth’s purchasing power each year. Saving is expensive.
This is not a natural state of affairs. It is the consequence of a monetary system in which money creation is tied to debt creation. The monetary system literally incentivizes its users into debt.
The broader consequences: corporate balance sheets optimize for debt leverage rather than cash reserves. Governments run perpetual deficits because the political cost of spending is lower than the political cost of taxing. Individuals are pushed toward real estate debt as the only available inflation hedge that most people can practically access.
The Exit
Saylor and Breedlove’s framework for Bitcoin, money as meta-energy, the monetary medium with the least leakage wins, reads differently in light of Cantillon analysis.
Fiat doesn’t just leak. It leaks by design. The leakage is a feature, not a bug, because the leakage is the mechanism by which seigniorage flows to the institutions that control the money supply.
Bitcoin eliminates this mechanism. Not by regulation or policy but by mathematical structure. No one creates new Bitcoin through credit issuance. The supply is fixed. No discretionary Cantillon effect is possible: the only new issuance is the block subsidy, fixed in advance, public, and paid to whoever spent the energy to earn it.
When Bitcoin is described as a system of rules rather than rulers, this is the specific mechanism meant: a system where the supply cannot be increased at the discretion of any party, and therefore where no party can extract seigniorage at the expense of others.
The fiat standard has lasted a century because it solved a real problem, spatial salability, and because the benefits accrued to those with the power to maintain it. Bitcoin solves the same spatial problem without the Cantillon effect, without debt-based money creation, and without the institutional structure that captures the seigniorage.
“Bitcoin is a device for transferring wealth from the impatient to the patient.”
— Stephan Livera
Sources: The Fiat Standard Ch.1–6 (Ammous) | Fiat Ruins Everything Pt. I (Song) | What Has Government Done to Our Money (Rothbard) | The Hidden Cost of Money (Bunney) | The Big Print (Lepar) | Saylor Series Eps. 9, 11 (Breedlove)
What Is A.W. Block?
A.W. Block is a digital asset estate investigation and Bitcoin advisory firm. On the estate side, we support attorneys, probate administrators, and fiduciaries with asset identification, blockchain investigation, and court-ready documentation. On the advisory side, we work with individuals and institutions on Bitcoin custody, accumulation strategy, and education.
awblock.io
Found value? Share, subscribe, and/or send sats here: bc1qrlgzu0m94wdrsnxjg8qym7jtnudelgfypmjmaa